Art In Its Proper Place
by Bob Fisher, March 19, 2003
In a paper published on the Internet, Eric Rosenbloom discusses mythology as
an expression of the complex and problematic relationship of humanity to nature
a dynamic he hypothesizes as creating anxiety and guilt as we struggle
with our ambivalent feelings toward nature. He also suggests that the conflict
between humans and nature is exacerbated by ongoing scientific discoveries that
continue to confound the "human ego" by confirming our identity with
nature. He suggests one principal way of resolving this conflict: "Art
alone, at its best, speaks honestly to the human soul. Art alone takes us out
of ourselves and then, unlike science or commerce or religion or politics returns
us to ourselves. Through art, we move beyond mythology, to accept ourselves
and the world, and live."
A 1999 report titled A Sense of Place A Sense of Being from the
federal government's Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, suggests that
our sense of place is "central to an understanding and experience of culture"
and that "We derive a sense of place from the landscape, the buildings,
and the artifacts that surround us." The report emphasizes that in order
to understand who we are, we first have to understand and appreciate where
we are. Although the report was focussing on our cultural heritage, it seems
to me that our sense of place and our sense of being are also to be found in
a far greater context, our natural heritage.
These thoughts became especially meaningful to me after a recent visit to see
Nature Resplendent, a startling retrospective exhibit of the watercolours
of Pat Clemes at the Frederick Horsman Varley Art Gallery of Markham. The visit
was also the occasion for some personal consciousness-raising on my part about
the important role of art galleries in local communities across Ontario as a
critical network for supporting and validating Canadian artists. The Varley
Art Gallery which is in many respects the home base with a community
as well as national mandate of one of Canada's most gifted artists, is
a prime example of this social dynamic.
Until I saw Clemes's work, I had always considered watercolour a medium that
expresses the artist's vision in a quiet, subtle way. It always seemed to me
that this was in fact the nature of the medium: delicate, fluid colours carefully
applied with light brush strokes on equally delicate white paper; the effect,
a quiet appeal to the senses, a tenuous, discreet impression of what the artist
sees. After my encounter with Clemes's work, however, my naive and rather patronizing
perception of this art form has been reformatted, if not reproved.
The main gallery in which Clemes's paintings are hung, is large, airy, and
spacious suggesting appropriately a kind of comforting town hall
space where people can move about chatting quietly and freely, observing
in short, feeling quite at home. The lustrous blond hardwood floor with its
unique recessed baseboards supports the room by reflecting light upward and
as a result does not fix the gallery space implacably at ground level. Visually,
the floor space liberates the turquoise walls that rise toward a high, gently-curving,
cathedral-like white ceiling which in turn amplifies the openness of the room.
Architecturally, the room has a neutral, non-rigid Scandinavian look and feel
to it. It is a space in which there are no harsh angles; the room constantly
takes your eye upwards. This is a suitably benevolent ambiance for the kinetic
art of Pat Clemes. It is a room in which things are allowed to happen.
 |
|
Standing in the middle of the room I am aware
of waves of colour emanating from the walls. The large evenly-spaced watercolours,
many of which average 55 by 75 centimetres, create a continuum of the most
vibrant colours I have ever seen in this medium. Their intensity is such
that I am drawn to them collectively; no individual painting captures my
sole attention. My usual strategy of devising a plan of action a
way of working the room in an art gallery is thwarted. The pervasive
sweep of colour defeats any systematic approach to the exhibit; attempting
to impose my order on this exhibit will obviously be ineffectual. As a result,
I don't quite know where to begin, or how. So I go with the flow and allow
my senses to make directional choices for me, which I suspect is the most
effective way to interact with Clemes's art. |
I am facing the north wall on which several large paintings of flowers are
hung. The flowers are amplified as if viewed through a close-up portrait lens;
their colours, shapes, and fine details rendered boldly and provocatively. As
I approach them, the luxurious blooms fill my field of vision: gloxinia, red
and crimson hibiscus, azaleas, and a riot of pansies. Their vibrancy is both
attractive and astonishing; there is movement within the paintings, and I sense
a kind of struggle. Clemes gives her images the added dimension of animation.
It is as if the florals are saying, "We are cultivated but not domesticated,
not tamed!" Their beauty is vigorous and assertive. The paintings have
a depth of field and an elaborate composition that makes them multi-dimensional.
They also have a strong tactile sense that makes me feel as if I am part of
a moment in time during which Clemes distilled the essence of the flowers. It
is as if I am among them, in the same mode and mood as the artist; the inherent
movement of these paintings suggests a transitory and capricious lifespan. Talking
about these particular paintings, Clemes has said, "The mood of the day
for me always seems to affect the character of the plant and the way I paint
it." Is this art imitating nature or is it the other way around?
Clemes uses colour unabashedly. The generous array of warm and cool colours
red, blue, purple, salmon, magenta, green is formidable and very
sensual, and the dexterity with which she paints detail in the petals, leaves,
and stems also reveals their delicacy and ephemeral nature. There is a wild
beauty to these paintings, and a strength of character .
Although I feel immersed in the florals, I am also becoming drawn to the paintings
to my left, seascapes and maritime scenes.
| Moving toward them, is like going from the specific
to the general, from the closely regarded detail to the complete picture,
and yet the same intensity and the same vigorous spirit is in both the close-ups
of flowers and panoramic maritime scenes. In Fishing Boats Near Lunenburg,
for example, the colours and brush strokes communicate a similar agitation
of natural elements; you can feel the energy, and the engagement of the
water and the wind. Although some might consider these paintings to be nature
unadorned, it's obvious that Clemes sees all of nature in that way. Human
activity is present in her work but secondary or only suggested. It is the
unregulated, spontaneous aspects of nature that her paintings express. Nothing
is contrived, planned, or dictated. It is clear that she paints on site,
in medias res. |
|
 |
Commenting on her own artistic process, she is quoted as saying, "For
me, a work 'cooked up' later, [loses] the initial impulse and the subtle nuances;
the character of the moment [is] lost." And I understand the immediacy
of mood and the spontaneity of feeling that her glowering skies and unsettled
waters communicate. I am still astounded that this can be achieved in a medium
such as watercolour and yet it does seem to be a one-chance medium. You have
it, feel it, express it or you don't.
Moving now from ocean scenes to mountains, I see the perspective and context
increasing in size and scope. Imposing views of mountains in Banff, the Rockies,
and the Purcells emphasize the massive and the monumental in nature. Here Clemes
imbues her paintings with the immensity of time and space. I am reminded of
how our physical geography affects our psyche, short-term as well as long-term.
I understand a little bit better now the Canadian "sense of place."
Watching the forces of nature played out in these paintings I feel somewhat
diminished, as if I have been projected into the scene and that, I think,
is the point. But at the same time, the connection between these weighty mountains
and the delicacy of cultivated garden flowers is clear, and this somehow is
reassuring. Clemes seems to suggest that being part of it does not mean renouncing
one's self; the passion she depicts is in nature as well as in the human psyche.
As a gallery note attests, she is accentuating "the variable substance
of nature and being alive ... [the] passion and involvement of the experience
and of the moment."
These words confirm that viewing the paintings of Pat Clemes is an intense
experience especially as the distance between viewer and art between
viewer and nature is sharply reduced. The heightened sense of awareness
that this exhibit produces is also due to the rhythms of nature that Clemes
replicates in her work. The drama and fervor of some her stormier pieces are
followed at one point in the exhibit by more tranquil rural scenes, especially
in the heartland of Ontario cottage country. In them time seems held in check
just a bit, a moment's grace for reflection on the part of the viewer; nature
is being kind. In these calm landscapes she is especially adept at capturing
reflections on lakes, emphasizing the duality of observing the natural world;
to fully appreciate the often terrible beauty of nature one must become part
of it and then withdraw a little in order to process the experience. And these
quieter scenes are like the calm between two storms: the frenetic activity of
the floral symphonies she paints and the deep resonance of her maritime and
mountain scenes.
In her European landscapes in the south of France, Clemes again communicates
a distinct sense of place however she seems more distant in them, or perhaps
engaged in a different way. Being familiar with the area, I can certainly attest
to the paintings' visual precision and to the way she evokes the provençal
landscape through the viewer's senses. There is in them, however, a separateness
that I don't feel in the Canadian paintings; they seem, quite understandably
I suppose, a little less de chez nous.
Clemes's art both disconnects and connects. Her paintings require that you
leave part of yourself behind when you engage with her in her art. However,
when you leave the gallery you come away with a greater understanding of nature
as a primal force in itself, as well as an essential ingredient of the human
mind.
Given the urbanized environments in which most Canadians live, it is not difficult
to understand the potential for alienation from nature. And if that alienation
from nature mirrors or indeed leads to social alienation, the importance of
art and nature as forms of mediation and mentorship becomes increasingly important.
To artists, mentorship is nothing new; it is in fact a prime mode of learning.
To be nurtured and supported by other artists is critical to the artistic process.
I am quite sure Frederick Varley and the Group of Seven understood this.
In addition to providing the general public with an important opportunity to
interact with an accomplished contemporary artist, this 30-year retrospective
of the art of Pat Clemes is a way in which skilled artists like her can encourage
and mentor their colleagues. Above all, Pat Clemes has given both the general
public and the artistic community an enhanced sense of place.

Nature Resplendent is at the Frederick Horsman Varley Art Gallery in
Unionville until April 12.It will be at the Tom Thomson Memorial Art Gallery
in Owen Sound in the fall. For more information visit www.city.markham.on.ca/markham/channels/gallery/exhibitions.htm.
You can meet the artist herself when she comes to Unionville on April 6 to
do a "walk through" of the gallery. Clemes is represented commercially
by the Kinsman Robinson Galleries in Toronto (www.kinsmanrobinson.com)
and the Joan Ferneyhough Gallery in North Bay (www.ferneyhoughgallery.com).
Digital images of her paintings can be seen on the Joan Ferneyhough website.
Eric Rosenbloom's article can be found at www.kirbymountain.com/rosenlake/nature-guilt.html
For a similar micro-macro, inside-outside visual experience, visit the website
micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/
CorporateMarkham.com invites you to respond to these thoughts. You can e-mail
your comments to Bob Fisher at
robefish@pathcom.com.
Archives:
March 1, 2003 -- Flying the Bear
February 7, 2003 -- Homing
January 19, 2003 -- Horse Play
January 1, 2003 -- A Bicycle Built For Two
December 14, 2002 -- The Christmas Party
December 1, 2002 -- Where There's A Willow,
There's A Way
November 22, 2002 -- Incorporating Markham
|